Posts Tagged News daily
When Life Insurance Becomes a Liability
Posted by David in Business news, Economy news on May 22nd, 2009
OWNING life insurance is supposed to make you feel more secure. These days, it’s often a source of anxiety instead.
People who are less wealthy suddenly need a bigger policy to protect their families. People whose policy investments have been battered face unexpected premium increases. And even those who feel adequately insured at affordable prices are worried about their insurers’ ability to meet financial commitments.
In addition to investment losses, premium increases have shocked many people. “This is a real issue for clients who own variable policies,” said Loretta Nolan, president of Loretta Nolan Associates, a certified financial planner in Old Greenwich, Conn.
These policies combine insurance protection with a tax-deferred investment account that helps to pay the premiums. During the bull market, they promised investment returns high enough to limit the size and duration of premium payments. But the marketers didn’t stress the downside: if investment performance falls short, policyholders must spend more on premiums.
And that’s what has happened. Now, policyholders must pay higher premiums, for more years, to maintain their current level of insurance. The alternative is to reduce the coverage, which sometimes leads to a surrender charge.
If you’re in this situation, do a policy stress test, advised Ms. Nolan: ask the insurer to project your future premiums, assuming the policy investments earn a modest 4 percent return. If that shows you can’t afford the premiums, you need to consider alternatives.
If your priority is keeping your insurance, Ms. Nolan suggested replacing some of your variable coverage with a less-expensive term policy. For example, if you have a $500,000 variable policy, you might buy $300,000 of term insurance and trim your variable policy to $200,000, keeping your total premiums affordable. But if you see the variable policy chiefly as an investment loss — and don’t need the insurance — you might want to exchange it for an annuity, said Glenn Daily, a fee-only insurance consultant in Manhattan. The exchange is a tax-free transaction (called a 1035 exchange) that lets you use your loss to offset taxes on future gains. If you lost $30,000 in the variable policy, for example, your first $30,000 of gain in the annuity would be tax-free.
If your net worth has taken a 30 percent hit, advisers say you probably need more insurance to protect your family, at least until your stock portfolio and your home regain value.
Determining how much you need is more an art than a science, said Richard B. Freeman of Round Table Services, a Westport, Conn., wealth management firm. Instead of relying on a software program that would probably recommend more than you would ever buy, he suggested that you think in terms of two lump sums — one to pay off your mortgage and cover your children’s college education and the other to create income for your survivors.
A nonworking spouse needs insurance, too, added Mr. Freeman: “If Mom’s home with the kids, her policy has to do more than hire a nanny and a housekeeper. It should be big enough to let Dad take a job with shorter hours closer to home, so he can have more time with the kids if he’s the surviving parent.”
The cheapest way to increase your coverage is with term insurance, often available in a group plan through your employer. But that is not necessarily the cheapest way to buy it. If you’re healthy, you might get a better deal by shopping for an individual term policy, said Mark Cortazzo, senior partner at Macro Consulting Group, a Parsippany, N.J., financial adviser, especially if you’re a woman in a state with unisex rating for group insurance.
If you’re in poor health, you might want to buy as much group insurance as possible at work. You can usually convert it to an individual policy without evidence of insurability, albeit at a price, when you leave the job, Mr. Cortazzo said.
If you have serious health problems, you should avoid the standard application process for individual coverage because your application will probably be rejected after the medical exam. With each rejection it is harder to find coverage.
Instead, you should enlist a broker who specializes in the high-risk market to present your case informally to insurers. He can make sure you formally apply only to those companies that will accept you. You may soon have more options if insurers with highly publicized financial difficulties relax their underwriting standards to maintain their sales volume, said Wil Heupel, managing principal of Accredited Investors, a Minneapolis financial planning firm.
So how do you avoid buying insurance from a company whose health is worse than your own? Advisers say that if you’re buying more than $3 million in coverage it’s prudent to diversify among several highly rated companies.
“Work with a broker who sells the policies of many carriers,” Mr. Freeman said. An agent represents only one, whose problems he may minimize.
( Source NYT)
More Investors, Chastened by Stock Losses, Settle for Municipal Bonds
Posted by David in Banking news, Finance news on May 22nd, 2009
THE historic lure of most municipal bonds has been their tax-free returns. But the recession and the rash of corporate troubles have widened their appeal to investors wary of the stock market who want to settle for a steady if unspectacular return.
Municipal bonds are still the terrain of high earners, who like their safety and higher tax-adjusted return than Treasury bonds. But increasingly average retail investors have been buying them to fill out their bond allocations. “Our average account has increased their asset allocation in fixed income to 52 percent and most of that is in munis,” said Robert Everett, director of fixed income at the Boston Private Bank and Trust Company. He said that was an increase of 15 percentage points from last year.
Even though the major stock markets have risen in the last month, uncertainty about the rally abounds. Suddenly, the return on a municipal bond of 6 to 7 percent, including the tax exemption, seems great.
The other draw has been safety. Historically, the default rate on investment-grade munis is less than a quarter of a percent, compared with almost 2 percent for corporate bonds. And the difference in yield between United States Treasuries and munis has recently been as much as 2.5 percent.
Given the pressure on city and state coffers, the default rate is likely to rise closer to 1 percent. But that is far lower than the yields on munis suggests, said George Strickland, a managing director at Thornburg Investment Management of Santa Fe, N.M. “The market thinks 20 percent of investment grade issuers will default in the next 10 years,” he said. “The major muni issuers are doing well.”
Being selective with munis is key. The first risk investors need to understand is the difference between general obligation and revenue bonds. General obligation bonds are sold to finance the daily operations of a municipality. Legally, that entity is obligated to do whatever it needs — from cutting services to raising taxes — to make its bond payments.
A revenue bond is sold to finance particular projects like hospitals, utilities and stadiums. The receipts from such projects are used to make the bond payments, and many investors have started to wonder how these will hold up.
“Stay away from revenue bonds, backed by projects like a parking lot at a university,” warned Gregg S. Fisher, chief investment officer of Gerstein Fisher, an investment advisory firm in New York. “If cars stop showing up, then you could have trouble getting your money.”
Hospital bonds also need to be evaluated carefully. “Community hospitals with A and BBB ratings are feeling the pinch because people without insurance go to them and can’t pay,” said Ronald J. Sanchez, director of fixed income strategies at Fiduciary Trust, a unit of Franklin Templeton Investments. “You need to avoid certain segments with greater risk.”
This points to another issue: liquidity. Roughly $360 billion of new bonds are sold annually. New York and California are the benchmark issuers and their bonds are traded often. But there are scores of municipalities that sell bonds that buyers may have to hold for their duration because of illiquid markets.
Munis are traded in an over-the-counter fashion, which means finding a price quote, let alone a buyer, can be difficult at times.
For those aware of the risk, there are investing opportunities. During the first quarter, few municipalities sold bonds because they were waiting to see what the stimulus plan would bring them. Now, cities and states are making up for lost time.
Several portfolio managers advise that shorter-dated munis are safer. “The longer the duration the more volatility,” said Mr. Strickland, who likes the two- to three-year range.
Diversification is also being pushed for munis. Historically investors have concentrated on bonds from their state to get the full tax deduction. But owning bonds from other states could give them a greater return, as in the case of California, where a fiscal crisis has pushed up yields.
The recession has brought about new securities, known as Build America Bonds, to help ailing municipalities raise money. They allow municipalities to sell taxable bonds for capital projects while receiving a rebate from the federal government for a portion of their borrowing costs. The program is meant to attract institutional investors who typically do not buy munis. But they could also suit a retail investor who wants to put them in a taxable retirement account.
Source NYT
Toyota announced business reports with figures on the loss to 7.74 billion USD
Posted by David in Economy news, News on May 15th, 2009
Toyota has marked five loss record within 59 years, due to degradation policy and business failure. Manufacturers predict this situation will not better this year due to global economic recovery can not som.
On Friday, Toyota announced business reports with figures on the loss to 7.74 billion USD in three months first year. This loss is under the biggest employers since its establishment and also the largest of Manufacturers Japan. Business results financial year ends on 31 / 3 mark five business first failed by Toyota after 59 years of operation.
Only a year ago, Toyota Motor usurpation General to become the production car the world’s largest. But this year, employers face black dark period from the birth. Results Toyota’s business not only to illustrate the picture of global degradation, but also the evidence for failure in business strategies.
Before degradation boomed, Toyota has expanded production in the U.S. because of that demand will continue to rise. However, economic crisis occurs, the purchasing power suddenly decreased. Recently, to a Toyota factory in Mississippi and down to suspend production line in Texas. Well apply multiple changes in leadership of Tokyo and the U.S.. The analysis is concerned groups will be difficult to continue the policy work life for workers.
Decline in purchasing power is the main cause of loss caused by Toyota for 3 months in 2009. In addition, the yen remains strong price makes products manufacturers become expensive when exported to foreign countries. This quarter loss more than predicted by the analysis, and serious than the 6 billion of U.S. car manufacturer General Motors.
Significant area of concern is the Toyota North America, the largest with 7 of 36 Toyota factories around the world. Since last year, Toyota has cut production in order to overtake speed decreased purchasing power on the market. Price reduction on the gas market of North America led Models of energy saving by Toyota are no longer popular. In 3 months this year, Toyota sold only 24,277 of the hybrid Prius in the U.S., with sales in 5 / 2008.
Chairman of Toyota, Katsuaki Watanabe, he said: “We feel sorry that he is not sensitive enough to quickly resolve the problems now.” “Economic degradation occurred too fast and strong policies, regional diversity, which is the strength of Toyota, was to promote work. Sales of our decline in all markets,” he Katsuaki Watanabe said in the report of the meeting Friday.
However, while General Motor may soon got the Chrysler in the application for bankruptcy protection, the Toyota can still older than the period of this difficult, with potential major financial. Toyota factory in San Antonio, USA, are running only one production line, but still determined not to lay off any staff. Factory in Woodstock, both in Canada and only one batch of dismissal only. Last week, Toyota declared production will increase some form such as car and Camry Rav4.
To solve the problem in North America market, on 6 Toyota will appoint a new director for the area is Mr. Yoshi Inaba, leaving each position Toyota’s leadership in 2007.
This year, the situation will not seem better for Toyota to have vuốt lost opportunities in China, when the car needs a small form growing in this market. In addition, degradation financial Toyota will not make enough potential to invest in the new project, the first demand on the American market.
Toyota’s goal this year is only 6.5 million vehicles worldwide, compared with the number 7.57 million in the fiscal year just ended on 31 / 3 last. Also in the news conference Friday, President of Toyota received the global economy is difficult to be able to recover soon.
(Follow to WSJ)
France makes supreme defence effort
The French Government last night passed 36 decrees providing for heavy additional taxation and drastic economies to mobilise the nation resources for defence and to meet an extra expenditure of £85.000.000 on armaments
M Reynaud, Finance Minister, in a broadcast appeal to all classes to make fresh sacrifices for the country’s security, declared that a supreme effort was necessary if France and Britain were to succeed in the trial of strength between totalitarian Powers and their own regime of liberty.
Conversations will open in Venice today between Count Ciano and M Markovitch, the Italian Jugoslav Foreign Ministers. Next week M Markovitch will fly to Berlin with talks with Heir Hitler.
Germany and Italy are understood to be anxious to introduce Jugosavia to join the Rome-Berlin axis, as part of a large attempt to undermine Anglo-French influence in the Balkans.
In London, Paris and Moscow negotiations for a Three-Power pact are proceeding actively. Soviet proposals of a far-reaching character are being considered by the British and French government.
M REYNAUD’S warning to nation
M Reynaud, French Minister of Finance, broadcast to the nation tonight on the Daladier government’s drastic programme of taxation and economy to meet extra armaments expenditure of £85,000.000.
Added to the ordinary and extraordinary armed budget and the money spent on defence during the September crisis, this figure brings to total to £427,000.000 in the past eight months.
Today’s new measures are embodied in a series of 36 decree laws, approved by the Council of Ministers this evening and coming into force next week.
Their effect will be to place France virtually on a war-time basis so long as the present international tension lasts.
SPECIAL SALES TAX
Bread And Milk Excepted
The decree laws provide for a special sales tax of 1 per cent on all purchases except those already subjected to certain taxes on production. All retail sales will be affected by this new tax, but purchases of bread, milk and certain agricultural products derived from the farm are not affected.
Export sales will not be subject to the tax, which will be collected from the cellar and will be based on the turnover declared to the tax inspector.
Another decree deals with the control of profit on the production of armaments, which, in effect, will be limited to 10 per cent.
The new tax on these profits will increase progressively, starting at 50 per cent on the portion of profit between 6 and 10 per cent, and increasing to 80 per cent on the portion between 10 and 20 per cent. All profit of more than 20 per cent is taken wholly by the State.
Jonathan Ross is the most influential ‘Twitterer’ in the world
Jonathan Ross is the most influential ‘Twitterer’ in the world, beating US President Barack Obama and Downing Street, despite having fewer followers, according to new research.

* Technology News * Technology Reviews * Video Game Reviews * Technology Advice * Technology Video 1. Home 2. Science and Technology 3. Technology 4. Twitter Jonathan Ross tops the Twitter 'Most Influential' List Jonathan Ross is the most influential ‘Twitterer’ in the world, beating US President Barack Obama and Downing Street, despite having fewer followers, according to new research. By Emma Barnett, Technology Correspondent Last Updated: 3:40PM BST 06 May 2009 Ross tops Twitter influential index: Jonathan Ross tops Twitter 'Most Influential List' TV host Ross topped the list, while celebrity blogger, Perez Hilton, came second, with comedian Stephen Fry and US actor Ashton Kutcher taking third and fourth spots respectively.
Brand agency JCPR produced the ‘Twitter index’ which, unlike similar existing league tables, measured influence, instead of popularity alone. Celebrity blogger, Perez Hilton came in second, while comedian Stephen Fry and US actor and presenter Ashton Kutcher took third and fourth spots respectively.
Using a specially developed algorithm, the agency tracked famous Twitter users around the world, ranking the top 200 based on the number of followers each user had, as well as the interest their posts generated among followers. This also included the number of times their name was mentioned and how many times they were ‘retweeted’ by others.
There are six UK Twitter users in the global top 20, including Father Ted and The It Crowd writer Graham Lineham, who came in fifth, Downing Street at 12th, Jason Bradbury, host of Channel Five’s Gadget show at 13th and Phillip Schofield, ITV’s This Morning presenter, at 14th.
Jackie Cooper, founding partner of JCPR, said: “We are always trying to help our clients understand the influence that certain celebrities have over particular sections of society. Behind all the glitz and glamour that goes with fame, it‘s important to understand where real influence lies, which is often very different to mere popularity. The JCPR Twitter Index helps us define that within the hugely dynamic social media space.”
The index will make interesting reading to Ashton Kutcher who recently went head to head with CNN to be the first ‘twitterer’ with one million followers. He even took out billboard advertising to achieve the goal.
Kutcher and his US actress wife, Demi Moore (ranked sixth) were in large part responsible for making Britain’s Got Talent singing star Susan Boyle famous in the US. It was only when Moore confessed that she was moved to tears by the unlikely singing sensation after seeing here on Kutcher’s Twitter page that the mainstream media and You Tube views exploded on the other side of the Atlantic.
Budget 2009: archive of events on the day
Posted by David in Economy news on May 9th, 2009
10.08 Iain Dale, the Tory blogger, has set out his (self-confessedly unlikely) hopes for today. Among other things, he wants: Real cuts in public expenditure of at least 5 per cent each year for the next five years; the abolition of Regional Development Agencies and all the other regional quangos and the cancellation of the planned 45p tax band for high earners.
10.07 On those lending figures, Brian Murphy from the Mortgage Advice Bureau, comments: “It certainly reflects what we are seeing, namely small but very definite increases in buyer interest in the first quarter, which is resulting in a modest rise in the level of clients committing to purchase. Today’s figures are also consistent with what other industry groups are saying.”
09.59 A tiny respite from the gloom on this unsuitably beautiful day in London: The Council of Mortgage Lenders has reported that gross mortgage lending rose to £11.5 billion in March, up by 16.2 per cent from £9.9 billion in February. It’s not much given how far down things have fallen, but it’s perhaps a further sign of stabilisation.
09.56 Commenting on the new jobless figures, Global Insight’s Howard Archer writes: “Claimant count unemployment rose less than feared in March, but it is hard to gain much comfort from a still very substantial increase of 73,700 … the reduced rise does not significantly affect our belief that the sharp contraction in economic activity since the third quarter of 2008 will continue to feed through for some time to come to batter the labour market.”
09.52 The FTSE has opened lower ahead of what is predicted to be a landmark Budget from Alistair Darling with all kinds of borrowing and deficit records set to be broken, writes City Diary Editor Jonathan Russell. How he puts a positive gloss on the figures will be keenly watched by the political observers, but foreign exchange traders wil be focused on the size of the government’s debt.
Banks and retailers continue to push ahead. Banks have been buoyed by US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner’s comments yesterday that their US counterparts have enough capital. Barclays, Lloyds and Royal Bank of Scotland are all making decent gains.
09.42 The Government borrowed £28 billion in March, according to the ONS. It’s the biggest figure on record.
09.39 Prices for UK government bonds are sliding in morning trading as investors anticipate Darling’s borrowing binge, Richard Blackden writes. The bond market expects the Treasury to ask investors to stump up an unprecedented £180bn this year. “No one wants to get caught off guard,” said one trader.
09.30 The unemployment total rose by 177,000 in the three months to February, the ONS announces. The total now stands at 2.1 million. Public sector net borrowing reached £90 billion, in line with the worst forecasts by City experts.
09.22 alexbailey50 tweets that she agreed with BBC Radio 1’s Only Fools And Horses-inspired budget suggestion: “No income tax, no V.A.T, No money back, no guarantee… We’ll cut prices at a stroke”
09.09 The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders is bracing itself for an announcement on cash-for-bangers scheme, which it believes is crucial for the future of UK vehicle manufacturing, writes Graham Ruddick, City Reporter. However, the FT reports this morning that Alistair Darling will force car companies to put forward half of the £2,000 subsidy. The industry believes this would be a disaster. Paul Everitt, the SMMT chief executive, said last week: “Bluntly, I don’t want to be standing up and saying: ‘It’s sort of all right’. I want to say: ‘This is fantastic, this is the best possible time for you to buy a car’.”
Read our questions troubling the Chancellor about the scrappage scheme.
09.00 Interviewed outside his west London home this morning, David Cameron, the Tory leader, tells reporters that today will be the day when Labour’s “spend, spend, spend” mentality will finally be shown to have been a disaster. He says the public finances are “drowning in red ink”.
08.44 Those wags at Conservative HQ have had a “black hole” drawn on the street outside HM Treasury . It features “caricatures of Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling disappearing down a cavernous gap in the pavement, followed by Mr Darling’s red Budget box”, the Press Association reports. David Gauke, a shadow treasury spokesman clearly headed for Mount Olympus/Rushmore, comments: “It’s a great drawing”.
08.40 Ruth Kelly, the former Treasury minister and Transport Secretary barely seen since her resignation from the Government at Labour party conference last September, is on Sky News hammering the line that Mr Darling will guide us to recovery. Investment is needed to turn around the unemployment juggernaut, she suggests.
08.27 Another good detail in that Independent poll is on which politicians business leaders trust to run the economy. Ken Clarke, the shadow business secretary and former chancellor, is the favourite, enjoying the support of 69 per cent of them. Vince Cable has 62 per cent, David Cameron 61 per cent and George Osborne 41 per cent.
It’s bad news for the Government’s big three: Lord Mandelson has 35 per cent, Gordon Brown 30 per cent and Alistair Darling just 22 per cent. But spare a thought for poor old Nick Clegg: only 19 per cent of business leaders trust him.
08.15 Nick Robinson tells Today that Mr Darling will be clear: voters can choose Labour’s “invest for recovery” plan or suffer the Tories’ drastic slashes in public spending. Sounds rather like the political dividing line that got us here, from where we’re standing.
08.00 Three in 10 business leaders detect the “green shoots” of economic recovery, according to a poll for The Independent. “The findings will be a fillip to Alistair Darling as he tries to deliver an upbeat message about post-recession Britain in today’s Budget,” it writes.
07.51 The Mail also reports on the row between the Treasury and the IMF over those figures mentioned below. The IMF originally put the cost of Britain’s banking rescue at £200 billion, you see, before withdrawing this in the face of furious lobbying from the Government. It later “downgraded the total to just over £130billion”.
07.49 No doubt Alistair Darling’s famous eyebrows will be working overtime today as he tries to convince the electorate he has the answers to Britain’s economic downturn, writes City Reporter Jamie Dunkley. To explore the wonderful world of celebrity brows, see our slideshow.
07.45 Grandparents who give up work to care for their grandchildren will get a significant pensions boost in today’s Budget, the Daily Mail reports. They will receive National Insurance credits to ensure they build up a full state pension, it adds.
07.44 Sterling is treading water against the euro and the dollar ahead of the Budget, writes Telegraph Online City Editor Richard Blackden. But make no mistake, financial markets will be watching this Budget more closely than usual. It’s investors, after all, who will be having to dig deep to fund the Government’s borrowing splurge.
07.31 As the clock ticks down, the last-minute pleas get louder, writes City Reporter Graham Ruddick. The British Property Federation has urged the Chancellor to abolish the tax on growing number of empty buildings created by the recession.
07.23 Robert Peston, the BBC Business Editor, tells Today that the public sector borrowing figures are the story of the day. A year ago Mr Darling said borrowing this year would be £38 billion, by the autumn it was £118 billion, and today it’s likely to be announced that £180 billion is needed, Peston says. He describes this as an “astonishing, unprecedented deterioration in the public finances” and says there’s a danger more government bond auctions could fail.
07.19 British taxpayers face a bill for the financial crisis of £5,000 each, our own Edmund Conway and Robert Winnett report this morning. The IMF predicts that Britain faces “one of the worst losses of any leading industrialised nation in the world from the financial rescue – amounting to about £140 billion”.
07.12 Britain faces a “structural problem” in its public finances, not just a passing phase of deficits, Mr Cable adds. He blames the reliance on the City for the past decade. It all means more pain in people’s personal finances for longer, he says.
07.09 St Vince has popped up on BBC Radio 4’s Today Programme. He says the Lib Dems would take four million people on the lowest incomes out of the income tax system by raising the threshold to £10,000, and scrap the VAT cut in favour of effective investment in projects to get the economy back on its feet.
07.05 Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat treasury spokesman, has told GMTV: “We are now getting this thing called deflation - falling prices, falling wages - while at the same time the Government has an enormous deficit on the Budget, caused largely by the collapse of revenue from the City of London and that’s a problem that is going to continue for some years to come and balancing those is extremely difficult.”
07.02 Nick Robinson, the BBC Political Editor, tells Today that Mr Darling will be remembered not for the plans he was able to unveil, but the dreadful statistics he is forced to produce. Stephanie Flanders, the BBC Economics Editor, says Mr Darling is charged with performing a difficult balancing act - admitting the scale of the problem/setting out his plan to tackle it, and not spooking the markets.
06.59 In case we didn’t get the message, the Conservatives believe today is a “day of reckoning”, Theresa May, the shadow work and pensions secretary has told GMTV. “We are now facing the longest recession since the Second World War, we have the worst public finances of all the countries in the G20, government borrowing is set to reach record levels today and, of course, unemployment may now rise above the level which the Government inherited,” she said.
06.57 Let’s not forget that before Mr Darling steps up to the despatch box, the latest unemployment figures will be announced by the Office for National Statistics. BBC Radio 4’s Today Programme are predicting the jobless total will reach 2.1 million. That would be the highest number since January 1997.
06.53 Homing in on those Whitehall efficiency savings we’ve heard much about already, The Times reports that the cuts will need to total £45 billion by 2013-14, comprising “cutting office space, selling property, privatising assets and sharing purchasing contracts across the Government”. Ultimately, “thousands more Civil Service jobs will be lost”.
The “Budget for jobs” package will be more like £2.5 billion, it reckons.
06.46 Reporting on the splits within the Government over the Budget’s contents, The Guardian’s Patrick Wintour says: “One wing of the cabinet has been suggesting the chancellor should “soak the rich”, while others have urged that true political courage lies in starting to be honest about the need to cut public spending more than outlined last November.”
He adds: “There were indications over the weekend that the advocates of a ’soak the rich’ budget were winning in the argument”.
06.41 The Guardian predicts a “Budget for jobs“, specifying that it will “provide a guarantee of a job or training for all 16- to-24-year-olds unemployed for more than a year” and devote about £2bn in all to job-creation measures. Attempting to work out how we got here by looking back at Gordon Brown’s final Budget in 2007, its Economics Editor Larry Elliot says: “The Greeks had a word for it: hubris”.
06.30 Good morning on an era-defining Budget day. Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, will be on his feet in six hours. The Financial Times reports that he will “be forced to issue more than £200bn worth of government bonds this financial year … well over £50bn higher than the Debt Management Office estimated last month.”
“This record peacetime borrowing will overshadow Mr Darling’s aim of presenting a Budget for jobs and investing in future growth”, the FT says.
It also predicts the Budget will contain a “£1bn 1980s-style community work programme” to get under-25s off the dole and the much-trailed “£2,000 bounty … to encourage motorists to trade-in old cars for new models.”
Ten applicants chase every new job vacancy
Posted by David in Finance news on May 9th, 2009
Ten applicants are chasing every new job vacancy as the official nemployment rate approaches the 2million mark, new figures show.
James Purnell, the Work and Pensions Secretary, has admitted the outlook is bleak for the hundreds of thousands of workers made redundant as a result of the recession, saying: “It’s tough.”
The British Chamber of Commerce has predicted that unemployment will reach as high as 3.2 million by the end of next year, while experts anticipate that February will prove to have been the worst month for job losses for more than a decade, with as many as 100,000 finding themselves out of work in the past few weeks.
On Wednesday, when the latest monthly figures are announced, the jobless rate will almost certainly be shown to have breached the landmark 2m figure, having stood only a shade under last month at 1.9 million.
That would put the unemployment level at 6.5 per cent of the workforce. And as the jobless figures tend to lag behind changes in the economy, the full impact of the recession on unemployment rates is unlikely to be felt for some time.
Mr Purnell said that he would “quibble” with the figures produced by the TUC showing a 10 to one ratio for job seekers and vacancies, claiming that many people landed jobs which had not been advertised.
However he admitted: “It’s tough. The fundamental thing is that it is harder for people to find work at the moment, it’s very worrying for people around the country and we are dedicated to making sure we get people the help to get back in to work as quickly as possible.”
Speaking on the BBC’s Politics Show, Mr Purnell went on: “My job is to make sure that the help is there for people.
“So, for example, in January we announced we would be giving extra help for people to train, to set up their companies, we’ll subsidise employers to take on the long-term unemployed, and that’s precisely to make sure we learn the lessons of past recessions and we don’t have short term unemployment becoming long-term unemployment.
“Instead, we can do everything that we can to get people back in to work as soon as possible.”
Theresa May, the shadow work and pensions secretary, accused Mr Purnell of “complacency” for pushing ahead with a programme of job centre closures which was brought to a halt only in November.
She said: “Instead of providing extra support when unemployment began to rise, Labour continued its programme of job centre closures.
“Now unemployment is rising by more than 100 per cent in some areas and there simply aren’t the resources to cope.”
2,000 jobs at risk at Corus plant on Teesside
Posted by David in Finance news on May 9th, 2009
Corus, now owned by Indian conglomerate Tata, has been forced to warn almost two thousand workers at Teesside Cast Products plant in Redcar that they face redundancy if the four companies do not fulfil their legal obligations.
In an extraordinary move, the four firms sent a letter to Kirby Adams, the new chief executive of Corus, informing him that they were stopping orders from the plant with immediate effect.
Corus has reacted angrily claiming that the firms, Marcegaglia of Italy, Dongkuk Steel Mills of South Korea, Duferco Participations of Switzerland, and Alvory of Argentina, have breached a contract to buy 78pc of the plant’s production for ten years that they signed in 2004.
Corus claims that the consortium have benefited from the rise in steel price for the first years and are now walking away because of difficulties in the steel market.
Mr Adams said: “I am extremely disappointed that the consortium members have seen fit to take this irresponsible action.”
3,000 Corus jobs under threat after consortium pulls out of contract
Posted by David in Finance news on May 9th, 2009
The Prime Minister led widespread condemnation of the firms which suddenly scrapped a 10-year deal to buy steel from Teesside Cast Products. Corus said it had no choice but to mothball the landmark plant which is responsible for nearly 25pc of Britain’s steel output.
Mr Brown said: “The workers have served the contract that they have been engaged on very well indeed. We are doing everything in our power to ensure that the contract is upheld.”
Kirby Adams, Corus’s new chief executive, said: “This is a nasty way of doing business. The villains are these four companies, the victims are our employees who have just been cast aside. We are outraged.”
Mr Adams had been in the job just two days when he received a letter from the four firms – Marcegaglia of Italy, Dongkuk Steel of South Korea, Duferco Participations of Switzerland, and Alvory of Argentina – informing him that they were terminating a 10-year contract to buy 78pc of Teesside’s production that they signed in 2004.
The consortium agreed to meet Corus this week to discuss the contract but still refused to honour it. Demand for steel has halved in Europe and North America in the past year. It is thought the firms plan to buy steel more cheaply elsewhere. Mr Adams said he was particularly outraged because the consortium had benefited from soaring steel prices in previous years. He said: “The contract allowed them to buy the steel at cost price so these companies have made hundreds of millions of pounds from Teesside during the good years. Now times are tough and they say they’re off. It’s unacceptable.”
Corus said it was using “all legal means” to ensure the terms of the 10-year agreement were fully enforced and that the four consortium members fulfilled their contractual obligations.
But, with just two weeks of orders in the pipeline, Corus said it has no choice but to start the process of winding down the plant. The company will start a 90-day consultation with Teesside’s workers and unions. It is a body-blow to Teesside, which has already suffered heavy job losses as a result of the crisis in the car industry. The plant employs 2,000 workers directly and another 1,000 jobs depend upon it.
Lord Mandelson, the business minister, said: “It is essential that Corus does everything it can legally, and with the Government’s assistance, to reinstate the off-take agreement. It is unacceptable that such a development should threaten jobs on such a scale, with such a potentially devastating impact on the area.
“The Government stands ready to do what it can to support the company. We are not prepared to reconcile ourselves to inevitable closure of this plant.”
Congress Delays Action on Auto Industry Loans
Posted by David in Economy news on May 3rd, 2009
Congress faced a big question this week, but the answer will have to wait. The heads of the Big Three American automakers came to Washington to ask for money — on their private jets, critics noted. The chiefs of General Motors, Ford and Chrysler asked for twenty-five billion dollars in new loans. Congress already approved twenty-five billion in September to help the industry develop fuel-efficient vehicles.
Democratic leaders in Congress proposed to offer the additional loans with money from the financial rescue program approved last month. But Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson objected. He says the seven hundred billion dollars is just for investing to strengthen the financial system.
On Thursday, a group of Senate Democrats and Republicans announced agreement on a compromise. It would let the companies temporarily use the fuel-efficiency loans to pay for daily operations. G.M. and Chrysler both say they could be out of money by early next year.
But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says there are currently not enough votes in Congress to pass any bailout plan for automakers. He says they failed to make their case that this appeal will be the last.
The companies now have until December second to explain how they would use the loans as part of long-term plans to save their businesses. Congress is prepared to consider the plans the week of December eighth.
Peter Morici, a professor of international business at the University of Maryland, is among economists who oppose a bailout. He appeared at this week’s hearings. He says the Big Three should be permitted to fail. If they seek bankruptcy protection, he says, they will be able to cut costs, reorganize and become competitive again.
But General Motors chief executive Rick Wagoner warned that the economy could lose three million jobs in the first year if the Big Three fail. They employ a total of about two hundred forty thousand people. But that does not include dealers or suppliers or the auto parts industry. Auto sales, though sharply reduced now, usually represent about four percent of the economy.
The industry chiefs blamed the credit crisis for keeping people from getting car loans. But lawmakers said poor business decisions have hurt the Big Three. Autodata Corporation says fifty-three percent of new cars and light trucks sold in the United States in the first ten months of this year were imported. (VOA News )



